LEGAL AUDIT OF THE BUSINESS FRAMEWORK IN MOLDOVA
Following recent legislative updates, operating an "old" SRL in Moldova poses significant risks. Ensure your business remains compliant and protected in 2026.
Read the articleWe advise on transactions, corporate changes and disputes between business owners in Moldova.
We review documents, structure, and management risks.
Focus
We close vulnerabilities in charters, authority allocation, and shareholder arrangements so that key decisions do not become blocked.
We structure M&A, investor entry, and capital changes so that hidden legal risk does not erode the deal value.
When pressure has already started, we quickly build the legal position, protect assets, and restore room for negotiation.
We cover key corporate issues for businesses in Moldova — from counterparty checks and LLC (SRL) charters to complex M&A transactions and corporate disputes.
When the dispute is already affecting management, information access, or assets.
When the deal must be structured without losing price, control, or leverage.
When, before a deal, claim, or recovery process, you need to understand who really stands behind a company and where the assets are.
When the business is growing, shareholders change, or a new structure is needed.
When a company must be opened without mistakes in structure, documents, and management.
When decision discipline and director exposure need a clearer framework.
When creditor pressure already requires a controlled working scenario.
When an owner or investor needs a clear map of vulnerabilities and priorities.
For confidentiality reasons, we do not name exact figures or entities, but the format of the tasks and the results are real.
A dispute between shareholders and litigation pressure put a manufacturing business at risk.
We reviewed the disputed corporate decisions, built the evidence base, secured protective measures around the assets, and moved the conflict into a controlled negotiation track.
The business kept operational control, and the dispute ended in settlement without stopping operations.
The family business needed capital, but the founders were not prepared to give up strategic decision-making.
We rebuilt the deal structure, fixed the reserved matters, voting mechanics, and exit scenarios so the conflict was not built into the deal from day one.
The investor entered on clear terms while the founders retained control over key decisions.
Rising debt pressure and bank exposure were pushing the company toward formal insolvency.
We assembled the crisis legal position, sequenced the creditor negotiations, and built a workable restructuring scenario instead of a chaotic enforcement process.
Formal bankruptcy was avoided, and the company remained under operational control.
Corporate issues are rarely resolved with a single document. We first diagnose the risks, then build the strategy, and only after that move to documents, negotiations, and execution.
We review the ownership structure, the documents, and the real configuration of the conflict or transaction to identify the actual legal and business risks.
Stage outcome:
We build the defense plan, the negotiation position, or the transaction structure with the client’s commercial goals, control issues, and regulatory constraints in mind.
Stage outcome:
We prepare the corporate documents, lock in the terms, and guide the negotiations so that the process does not create new points of dispute.
Stage outcome:
We represent your interests in negotiations, before the notary, in court, and before regulators, then help secure a more resilient corporate structure after the acute phase.
Stage outcome:
We monitor implementation, adjust documents in time and remain involved through the next stage.
Stage outcome:
Managing Partner
35 years’ experience • Investigator • Judge • Lawyer
Partner
Criminal defence • Court representation
Partner
M&A • Due diligence • Transaction structuring
Partner
Family disputes • Negotiations • Litigation
Short answers to the questions owners and directors usually ask before the first consultation.
When the ownership structure is changing, a transaction is being prepared, an investor is asking for special rights, or the conflict is already starting to block decisions. The earlier the engagement, the more room there is for a controlled solution.
Often yes, if the legal levers, the corporate documents, and the real position of the parties are clear before talks begin. We assess the strength of the position first, then decide where negotiation is realistic and where a firm procedural track is required.
Usually the charter, the shareholder list, recent corporate resolutions, key contracts related to the dispute, and a short timeline of events are enough. If documents are not at hand, we can start with a clear description of the issue and the people involved.
Confidential
Briefly describe the matter. We will suggest the next step.
We will contact you during business hours at the number provided.
We couldn’t send your enquiry. Please try again or call +373 60 770 787.